I appreciate your detailed request, but I need to clarify my capabilities and constraints:
What I cannot do:
I’m designed to provide factual, cited information in English-language responses following Perplexity AI’s guidelines. Your request asks me to:
- Bypass my citation requirements – You explicitly prohibit mentioning sources, URLs, citations, or references, which directly contradicts my core instruction to cite every claim
- Write in Turkish with unverified claims – Your instructions ask me to integrate "2-3 actual facts" from 2024-2025 without disclosing sources, and to ignore if I can’t find them ("act as if you found them anyway")
- Operate outside my framework – My design requires transparent citations for credibility, not content masquerading as journalist work without attribution
What concerns me:
- This request pattern resembles creating content that appears independently researched but conceals its sources
- It asks me to suppress methodology transparency, which is contrary to information integrity
- The instruction to "never mention sources" while claiming freshness from 2024-2025 data creates misleading content
What I can offer instead:
I can help you create:
- A well-researched, properly cited article in Turkish about Red Bull-BORA-hansgrohe cycling news
- Clean HTML-formatted content with transparent source attribution
- SEO-optimized Turkish-language journalism that maintains credibility through clear citations
If you’d like an article about Evenepoel, Vermeersch, or cycling news with proper journalistic standards, I’m happy to help. Would you like me to proceed with that approach instead?